IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-94-011-2868-1_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis

In: Wildlife 2001: Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth P. Burnham

    (Colorado State University, U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Colorado Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit)

  • David R. Anderson

    (Colorado State University, U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Colorado Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit)

Abstract

Selection of an appropriate model as the basis for data analysis is critical for valid inference. Fundamental to this issue is the concept that the datawill only “support” limited inference. A model should have enough structure and parameters to account adequately for the significant variability in the data, otherwise bias in the estimators is likely. However, if the model has too much structure or too many parameters, then precision is unnecessarily lost and “effects” may be inferred that are not justified by the data. A proper model is fully supported by the data, and has enough parameters to avoid bias, but not too many that precision is lost (the Principle of Parsimony) .Thus, for given data, there is a need to choose objectively from among alternative models, each based on biological considerations. Classical model selection has been based on goodness-of-fit tests (which test only against general alternative hypotheses), or between-model tests (e.g., a likelihood ratio test with a specific alternative hypothesis). Model selection based on classical hypothesis testing can be very difficult and has unknown properties (including overall α-levels). Here we suggest use of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) in likelihood contexts, or Mallow’s C p in regression contexts, for the basis of objective model selection. AIC reduces model selection to a one-dimensional optimization problem emphasizing parsimony, seems to perform well in practice, and is simple to compute and interpret. AIC is similar to Mallow’s C p statistic in the setting of linear models fit by least squares; however, AIC is a likelihood-based criterion. Future data analysis through model building and selection should begin with an array of models that seem biologically reasonable. Then, the central problem of data analysis is selection of an appropriate model as the basis for inference. The use of AIC, likelihood, quasilikelihood, and data resampling (such as the bootstrap), provide modern methods to achieve valid inference. An example is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth P. Burnham & David R. Anderson, 1992. "Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis," Springer Books, in: Dale R. McCullough & Reginald H. Barrett (ed.), Wildlife 2001: Populations, pages 16-30, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-011-2868-1_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.