IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-4-431-68189-2_68.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

One Step Beyond: Problems with Traditional Game Evaluation

In: Global Interdependence

Author

Listed:
  • Bart van Linder

    (University of Amsterdam, Center for Innovation and Cooperative Technology (CICT)
    Counterpart Business Consultants)

Abstract

Game designers claim to deal with complex problems. However, they sometimes treat complex problems as if they were simple problems, thereby destroying all kinds of rich resources, like local variation, which are needed to cope with complex problems. In this paper I argue that this approach is partly due to the traditional methodology of evaluating and designing games. New, less traditional, ways have to be opened up. As a first step, three new criteria are introduced for the evaluation of an externally structured game called SWITCHER.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart van Linder, 1992. "One Step Beyond: Problems with Traditional Game Evaluation," Springer Books, in: David Crookall & Kiyoshi Arai (ed.), Global Interdependence, pages 340-340, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-4-431-68189-2_68
    DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-68189-2_68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-4-431-68189-2_68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.