IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-7908-2064-5_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Local Sensitivity in the Inequality Restricted Linear Model

In: Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Huaizhen Qin

    (Michigan Technological University, Department of Mathematical Sciences)

  • Alan T. K. Wan

    (City University of Hong Kong, Department of Management Sciences)

  • Guohua Zou

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science
    University of Rochester, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology)

Abstract

Diagnostic testing has traditionally been an important aspect of statistical modeling, but in recent years, sensitivity analysis has also been drawing increasing attention from econometricians and statisticians. Essentially, a diagnostic test ascertains if the model coincides with the assumed data generating process, while sensitivity analysis investigates if it matters at all that the model deviates from what is being assumed. That is, sensitivity analysis answers the question of whether a wrong model is still useful for certain purposes, and if so, it matters little that the model may be incorrect. For example, Banerjee and Magnus (1999) pointed out that the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator of the coefficients in a linear regression model is in fact not very sensitive to disturbances’ deviation from the white noise assumption. Consequently, it is quite usual to find the estimates of the parameters not changing much after fitting the model with a more general covariance structure. However, the F and t tests based on the OLS residuals are sensitive to covariance misspecification in the sense that a small stepping away from white noise disturbances is likely to cause a substantial distortion in the significance levels of the tests (Banerjee and Magnus (2000)). The current paper continues this line of research. We are concerned with a linear regression with a possibly incorrect inequality restriction (as opposed to strict equality restrictions as in Wan, Zou and Qin (2007)) on the coefficients. In econometric applications inequality restrictions frequently arise on the parameters. Finite sample properties of the inequality constraint least squares (ICLS) estimator have been investigated by Thomson (1982), Judge and Yancey (1986), Wan (1994a), Wan (1994b), among others. Judge and Yancey (1986), Wan (1994a), Wan (1994b), Wan (1995) and Wan (1996) considered the properties of the so-called inequality pre-test (IPT) estimator which chooses between the inequality restricted and OLS estimators depending on the outcome of a one-sided t test. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivity of the ICLS and IPT estimators to deviations of the disturbances from the white noise assumption. In the spirit of Banerjee and Magnus (1999), we propose sensitivity measures on the ICLS and IPT estimators to covariance misspecification and investigate the properties of these measures allowing for both correctly and incorrectly specified constraints. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives some preliminary results and defines sensitivity statistics to measure the sensitivity of the ICLS and IPT coefficient and variance estimators to covariance misspecification. Section 3 emphasizes the case of AR(1) disturbances and derives results concerning the limiting behavior of the sensitivity statistics when the AR(1) parameter is near the unitroot. Section 4 presents numerical findings on the sensitivity of the estimators under a variety of AR(1) and MA(1) settings and Section 5 concludes. Proofs of theorems are contained in Appendix A.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaizhen Qin & Alan T. K. Wan & Guohua Zou, 2008. "Local Sensitivity in the Inequality Restricted Linear Model," Springer Books, in: Recent Advances in Linear Models and Related Areas, pages 135-163, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-7908-2064-5_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2064-5_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-7908-2064-5_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.