IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-662-65265-7_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Fußabdruck und Bewertung

In: Entwicklungsmethodik nachhaltiger Produkte

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Lachmayer

    (Leibniz Universität Hannover)

  • Johanna Wurst

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

  • Jorin Thelemann

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die Bewertung von Produkten hinsichtlich ihrer ökologischen, ökonomischen und/oder sozialen Nachhaltigkeit stellt Unternehmen, Forschende und politische Entscheidungsträger vor komplizierte und auch zunehmend komplexe Herausforderungen. Ein zentrales Problem besteht darin, dass es keine universelle Definition oder Methode gibt, um Nachhaltigkeit in allgemeingültiger und ganzheitlicher Form zu messen. Verschiedene Branchen und Interessengruppen priorisieren unterschiedliche Nachhaltigkeitsziele, was zu einer Vielzahl von mitunter schwierig zu vergleichenden oder intransparenten Bewertungsansätzen führt.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Lachmayer & Johanna Wurst & Jorin Thelemann, 2025. "Fußabdruck und Bewertung," Springer Books, in: Entwicklungsmethodik nachhaltiger Produkte, chapter 5, pages 75-90, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-65265-7_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-65265-7_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-65265-7_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.