IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-662-43871-8_83.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Research of Evaluation Model of Confidential Work Assessment

In: Liss 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Yinan Cao

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Liping Shao

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

Abstract

Assessment is an important basis for testing effect of confidential work, adjusting confidential work and putting forward proposals. According to problems of current confidential work assessment, and following principle of constructing evaluation index system that comprehensiveness, operability, combining of qualitative indicators and quantitative indicators, this paper determined a confidential work evaluation index and calculated the weight of each index by using AHP theory. The evaluation model of confidential work provides an important reference to confidential work assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinan Cao & Liping Shao, 2015. "The Research of Evaluation Model of Confidential Work Assessment," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Zuojun Max Shen & Juliang Zhang & Runtong Zhang (ed.), Liss 2014, edition 127, pages 577-582, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-43871-8_83
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43871-8_83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-43871-8_83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.