IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-662-43871-8_179.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Comparison of Similarity Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

In: Liss 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Zhou

    (Beijing Jiaotong University
    Capital Normal University)

  • Runtong Zhang

    (Beijing Jiaotong University)

  • Yun Lin

    (Capital Normal University)

  • Ruimei Wang

    (Capital Normal University)

Abstract

This paper compared the properties of several measures of similarity of IFSs and provides a new definition of equilibrium line of a fuzzy set. This study aims to highlight the main theoretical and computational properties of the measures under study. It is show that several properties are common to all measures and some properties are not for all of them. This investigation is important due to the fact that it can provide us some useful information to select a suitable similarity measure in applications of IFSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Zhou & Runtong Zhang & Yun Lin & Ruimei Wang, 2015. "A Comparison of Similarity Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Zuojun Max Shen & Juliang Zhang & Runtong Zhang (ed.), Liss 2014, edition 127, pages 1237-1242, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-43871-8_179
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43871-8_179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-43871-8_179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.