IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-658-48710-2_21.html

A Startup Cockpit for the Proof-of-Concept

In: Handbuch Entrepreneurship

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Ripsas

    (Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht)

  • Birte Schaper

    (Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht)

  • Steffen Tröger

    (BigBoxBerlin 15qm GmbH)

Abstract

More and more innovative new ventures step away from the traditional business plan centred model and follow the “Lean Startup Idea”. This paper introduces a measurement tool – the Startup Cockpit – that helps startups on their way from an idea-based organization to a company with a profit-generating business model. It is based on the Customer Development model of Blank (The four steps to epiphany. San Mateo, 2006), the Lean Startup methodology of Ries (The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business, 2011), and Maurya (Running lean – Iterate from plan A to a plan that works, 2nd edn. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2012), the Lean Analytics concept of Croll and Yoskowitz (Use data to build a better startup faster. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2013) and Faltin’s ideas (Brains versus capital: Entrepreneurship for everyone – Lean, smart, simple. Berlin: Stiftung Entrepreneurship, 2013, Kopf schlägt Kapital. München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2008). All of those authors introduced a number of crucial processes and meta-principles that promote successful business model development for startups. In an innovation-driven market a business plan is not always the instrument of choice in the early days of a business. Many Internet startups have established a key performance indicators (KPI) oriented process and successfully refined their business model or, as Faltin calls it, the entrepreneurial design (cp. Kopf schlägt Kapital. München: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2008). This paper analyses the foundations of the Lean Startup process: the discovery-driven planning and the hypotheses-driven planning approach and the application of those principles in Ries’ Lean Startup methodology and Blank’s Customer Development model. A business plan still is a necessary tool. But it comes later in the startup process, after the proof-of-concept. In our research we found patterns in the usage of numbers/metrics/KPIs to support the business model design process – a Startup Cockpit seems to be within reach. But it is often said that “every entrepreneur is unique”. That makes it difficult to define a “one-size-fits-all”-set of KPIs that helps startups from different industries and in different development stages. Nevertheless, a generic Startup Cockpit can be outlined. But according to our findings it has to be adjusted to each startup’s situation. The main determinants are the development stage, the business model, the strategy, and the financing structure. We prefer the term “cockpit” over “dashboard” as the later has become directly linked to online business models whereas our approach is to find a generic approach to manage the process from an idea to the proof-of-concept. In the same way every airplane pilot and every car driver only tracks a selected set of information such as speed, engine temperature, and gasoline, an entrepreneur has to think about and find those elements of information that best reflect the core of his or her business model to achieve a better understanding of the process to the proof-of-concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Ripsas & Birte Schaper & Steffen Tröger, 2025. "A Startup Cockpit for the Proof-of-Concept," Springer Books, in: Günter Faltin (ed.), Handbuch Entrepreneurship, edition 2, pages 287-303, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-48710-2_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-48710-2_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-658-48710-2_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.