IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-25411-6_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Mobile- and Landline-Onlys in Dual-Frame-Approaches: Effects on Sample Quality

In: Telephone Surveys in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Götz Schneiderat

    (TUD)

  • Tino Schlinzig

    (TUD)

Abstract

Introduction Mass media, politics, and commercial enterprises are increasingly using social survey data to substantiate their reasoning and interventions. Although the number of telephone surveys is decreasing more than one third of all studies of market and social research in Germany is conducted on the telephone (ADM 2011). This raises questions about the quality of the gathered data. One of the central variables to look at is the quality of the realised sample. Reflecting the number of sample units interviewed as a percentage of the number of eligible sample units, response rates are considered reliable indicators of data quality. However, irrespective of the mode declining response rates question this assumption (Schnell 1997, de Heer 1999, Däubler 2002, de Leeuw and de Heer 2002, Curtin et al. 2005, Stoop 2005). In addition to the number of ineligible cases (including people not part of the target population or unable to participate) the quality of surveys of the general population suffers from nonrespondents. A growing number of contacted persons refuses participation in market and scientific surveys. Numerous studies have examined different aspects of this phenomenon in detail and offered solutions to the problem (Blasius and Reuband 1995, Hüfken 2000, de Leeuw and Hox 2004, Meier et al. 2005, de Leeuw et al. 2007, Schnauber and Daschmann 2008).

Suggested Citation

  • Götz Schneiderat & Tino Schlinzig, 2011. "Mobile- and Landline-Onlys in Dual-Frame-Approaches: Effects on Sample Quality," Springer Books, in: Sabine Häder & Michael Häder & Mike Kühne (ed.), Telephone Surveys in Europe, edition 127, chapter 10, pages 121-143, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-25411-6_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-25411-6_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.