IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-22128-6_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Networks of Promotors as Success Factor for Radical Innovations: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings

In: Innovation Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Rese

    (Brandenburg University Technology)

  • Daniel Baier

    (Brandenburg University Technology)

Abstract

Based on the conceptual framework developed in the previous chapter, this chapter presents empirical findings regarding the role and relevance of transformational leaders like “promotors” and “champions” in innovation networks, and their effect on innovation success. Section 2.1 gives an introduction to state-of-the-art innovation network research, success factor research and open innovation research, as well as linking key findings from these areas to the research agenda of Innovation Communities. Section 2.2 develops the theoretical background and terminology for studying the role of innovators and extends well-known studies on key persons in innovation projects by using a cross-company, network-oriented perspective. The chapter also develops concepts of group interaction and identity and operationalizes the Innovation Community concept for a large-scale survey. In Sect. 2.3, the research hypotheses on innovation communities are developed, and measures for promotor roles, group identity, group interaction, project performance and degree of innovativeness are introduced. Section 2.4 presents the findings of the innovation networks survey. The hypothesized relationships were tested using a comprehensive sample of 107 German networks of companies and research institutions. The results support the proposition that group interaction and group identity factors are significantly higher in successful innovation networks. One important finding of the survey is that innovation communities have a considerable (positive) effect on project performance and overall innovation success, especially in radical innovation projects. These “promotor networks” can be considered to be an important success factor for radical innovation projects. The implications of these findings are discussed in Sect. 2.5.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Rese & Daniel Baier, 2012. "Networks of Promotors as Success Factor for Radical Innovations: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings," Springer Books, in: Klaus Fichter & Severin Beucker (ed.), Innovation Communities, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 17-56, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-22128-6_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22128-6_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-22128-6_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.