IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-13872-0_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing Frequency-Based Flow Solutions to Traditional Unsteady Fluid Dynamics Analysis in Turbomachinery

In: High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching/Munich 2009

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hembera

    (Technische Universität München, Institute for Flight Propulsion)

  • Florian Danner

    (Technische Universität München, Institute for Flight Propulsion)

  • Marc Kainz

    (Technische Universität München, Institute for Flight Propulsion)

  • Hans-Peter Kau

    (Technische Universität München, Institute for Flight Propulsion)

Abstract

Unsteady simulations are applied to resolve the time-dependent flow in turbomachinery. Consequently, the interaction between stationary and rotating parts requires an appropriate interface to transfer the flow quantities of the domains. Traditionally a so called domain scaling is used in combination with a sliding mesh approach. This method requires the pitch of the simulated blades to be equal in order to allow the use of periodic boundary conditions while cutting down the number of represented blade passages. Thus computational time can be saved. On the other hand, the flow solution is altered due to the scaling of the geometry. In order to overcome this problem, the non-linear harmonic (NLH) approach has been introduced. It allows for non identical blade pitches of the rows, since the flow solution is based on a Fourier-decomposition. Hence, the oscillating influence due to the perturbations of adjacent blade rows is approximated. Within the present study an unsteady Navier-Stokes-simulation is compared to a NLH computation in order to explain differences of the approaches. Therefore, an unsteady full-annulus simulation with about 40 million gridpoints as well a NLHs simulation with only one simulated blade passage per row with 1.38 million gridpoints was performed. Additionally, a NLHs simulation with a finer mesh resolution of 7 million gridpoints is included.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hembera & Florian Danner & Marc Kainz & Hans-Peter Kau, 2010. "Comparing Frequency-Based Flow Solutions to Traditional Unsteady Fluid Dynamics Analysis in Turbomachinery," Springer Books, in: Siegfried Wagner & Matthias Steinmetz & Arndt Bode & Markus Michael Müller (ed.), High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching/Munich 2009, pages 161-174, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-13872-0_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13872-0_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-13872-0_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.