Author
Listed:
- Armin Seyfried
(Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre)
- Maik Boltes
(Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre)
- Jens Kähler
(Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science)
- Wolfram Klingsch
(Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science)
- Andrea Portz
(Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre)
- Tobias Rupprecht
(Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science)
- Andreas Schadschneider
(Universität zu Köln, Institut für Theoretische Physik)
- Bernhard Steffen
(Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Supercomputing Centre)
- Andreas Winkens
(Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Institute for Building Material Technology and Fire Safety Science)
Abstract
Summary In recent years, several approaches for modeling pedestrian dynamics have been proposed and applied e.g. for design of egress routes. However, so far not much attention has been paid to their quantitative validation. This unsatisfactory situation belongs amongst others on the uncertain and contradictory experimental data base. The fundamental diagram, i.e. the density-dependence of the flow or velocity, is probably the most important relation as it connects the basic parameter to describe the dynamic of crowds. But specifications in different handbooks as well as experimental measurements differ considerably. The same is true for the bottleneck flow. After a comprehensive review of the experimental data base we give an survey of a research project, including experiments with up to 250 persons performed under well controlled laboratory conditions. The trajectories of each person are measured in high precision to analyze the fundamental diagram and the flow through bottlenecks. The trajectories allow to study how the way of measurement influences the resulting relations. Surprisingly we found large deviation amongst the methods. These may be responsible for the deviation in the literature mentioned above. The results are of particular importance for the comparison of experimental data gained in different contexts and for the validation of models.
Suggested Citation
Armin Seyfried & Maik Boltes & Jens Kähler & Wolfram Klingsch & Andrea Portz & Tobias Rupprecht & Andreas Schadschneider & Bernhard Steffen & Andreas Winkens, 2010.
"Enhanced Empirical Data for the Fundamental Diagram and the Flow Through Bottlenecks,"
Springer Books, in: Wolfram W. F. Klingsch & Christian Rogsch & Andreas Schadschneider & Michael Schreckenberg (ed.), Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, pages 145-156,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-04504-2_11
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2_11
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-04504-2_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.