Author
Listed:
- Kerstin Schmidt
(Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Produktion und Logistik)
- Grit Walther
(Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Produktion und Logistik)
- Thomas S. Spengler
(Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Produktion und Logistik)
- Rolf Ernst
(Technische Universität Braunschweig, Institut für Datentechnik und Kommunikationsnetze)
Abstract
Summary An acceleration in technological change and shorter product life cycles lead among other things to companies‘ concentration on their core competencies and to a parallelization of formerly sequential processes. This results in an increasing number of collaborations between firms. This trend can also be observed in research and development, where projects are often conducted corporately by various partners. An example for such a cooperation is the development of embedded systems. Embedded systems are characterized by a modular design of different interacting hard- and software components. Thereby, the performance of the overall system depends on the interaction of the individual components‘ performances. In current system industry‘s practice, these components are developed by specialized suppliers and are then combined to the embedded system by a system integrator. Since these partners are usually legally and economically independent companies, the cooperation is regularized by contractual agreements. In practice, fixed-price contracts are most commonly used. In these contracts, components‘ requirements as well as prices are fixed ex-ante by the system integrator. However, uncertainties exist with regard to the outcome of the development process. For instance, the performance of components as well as of the overall system cannot be predicted with certainty. Additionally, partners may follow different objectives. Thus, ineficiencies in the design process as well as in the design of the embedded systems often occur. Some of these uncertainties and ineficiencies might be absorbed by making use of existing substitutional dependencies between components. However, this is not possible when inappropriate contracts as well as insufficient incentive structures are applied, since these lead to a decreasing exibility in the development process and thus to an increase in development costs. Thereby, economic risk for suppliers and integrators increases. Overcoming these difficulties requires improved coordination of the partners ahead of and during the development process. Hence, the aim of this contribution is to improve collaborative development processes of embedded systems by adapting mechanisms from supply chain management to development processes. As in supply chain management cooperation is regularized by contracts. In addition, uncertainties exist in the decentralized development processes as in supply chain management, which lead to ineficiencies in the cooperation. Supply chain management has rich experience in exible contracting with various incentives, targeting overall exibilization, risk mitigation, and economic fairness [1]. Unlike in supply chain management there are substitutional dependencies between components‘ attributes in the development process. However, differences between production and development processes currently prevent an easy adoption of these mechanisms. First approaches to the exibilization of contracts in embedded system development processes are given by [2, 3]. In the following section a mathematical model for cooperative development processes is described and analyzed with regard to the optimal actions of the partners.
Suggested Citation
Kerstin Schmidt & Grit Walther & Thomas S. Spengler & Rolf Ernst, 2009.
"Towards Coordination of Decentralized Embedded System Development Processes,"
Springer Books, in: Bernhard Fleischmann & Karl-Heinz Borgwardt & Robert Klein & Axel Tuma (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2008, chapter 36, pages 221-226,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-00142-0_36
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00142-0_36
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-00142-0_36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.