IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-95855-0_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

An Unfinished Polity

In: How Unified Is the European Union?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Persson

    (Uppsala University)

Abstract

The European Union is an unfinished polity. The single market has been completed, although free movement still works better for goods and capital than for services and people. At the same time, the four freedoms are protected by an imperative legal system. But the polity lags behind. Decisions bearing on the market are taken at Union level, whereas most decisions on fiscal policy – taxes and public expenditures – are taken at national level. Moreover, political decisions regarding the market are weakly anchored among European citizens. As a political system, the Union thus suffers from both a “social” and a “democratic” deficit. Is this a sustainable solution in the long run? That is the question of this chapter. The point of departure is that the Union is now at a crossroads. However, it is not the protracted nature of the ratification process for the Lisbon Treaty that is the main cause for this. The Irish rejection of the new treaty in a 2008 referendum may have spread gloom amongst proponents of European integration, but the problem is more fundamental than that. The atmosphere this time is marked by a spreading awareness that the Union is not fully legitimate in the eyes of European citizens. European citizens seem to be alienated from decision-making in Brussels. They are hardly involved in European politics at all. At the same time, the imbalance between the polity, the market, and the legal order is increasingly apparent.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Persson, 2009. "An Unfinished Polity," Springer Books, in: Lars Pehrson & Lars Oxelheim & Sverker Gustavsson (ed.), How Unified Is the European Union?, chapter 2, pages 11-26, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-95855-0_2
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-95855-0_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-95855-0_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.