IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-79182-9_49.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Efficient rent-seeking in experiment

In: 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 1

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Vogt

    (Otto-von-Guericke Universit ät Magdeburg)

  • Joachim Weimann

    (Otto-von-Guericke Universit ät Magdeburg)

  • Chun-Lei Yang

    (Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy Academia Sinica)

Abstract

In a series of experiments we show that people learn to play the efficient outcome in an open-ended rent-seeking game. This result persists despite quite different experiment environments and designs, like different propensities of competition, group sizes etc., and is interprtable as a resolution of the so-called Tullock paradox which states that real-world rent-seeking expenditures are much lower than what the standard rent-seeking model predicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Vogt & Joachim Weimann & Chun-Lei Yang, 2002. "Efficient rent-seeking in experiment," Springer Books, in: Roger D. Congleton & Arye L. Hillman & Kai A. Konrad (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 1, pages 681-692, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-79182-9_49
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79182-9_49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-79182-9_49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.