IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-77074-9_79.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Traffic Flow on Ant Trails: Empirical Results vs. Theoretical Predictions

In: Traffic and Granular Flow ’07

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander John

    (Universität zu Köln, Institut für Theoretische Physik)

  • Andreas Schadschneider

    (Universität zu Köln, Institut für Theoretische Physik
    Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für komplexe Systeme)

  • Katsuhiro Nishinari

    (University of Tokyo, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Faculty of Engineering)

  • Debashish Chowdhury

    (Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Physics)

Abstract

Summary We present empirical results for traffic flow on ant trails. The observed spatio-temporal organization of the ants as well as quantitative results for the fundamental diagram and headway distributions are compared with predictions of a cellular automaton model. In sharp contrast to highway traffic, no jammed phase is observed and the average velocity is almost independent of the density of ants.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander John & Andreas Schadschneider & Katsuhiro Nishinari & Debashish Chowdhury, 2009. "Traffic Flow on Ant Trails: Empirical Results vs. Theoretical Predictions," Springer Books, in: Cécile Appert-Rolland & François Chevoir & Philippe Gondret & Sylvain Lassarre & Jean-Patrick Lebacq (ed.), Traffic and Granular Flow ’07, pages 701-706, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-77074-9_79
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77074-9_79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-77074-9_79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.