Author
Abstract
An optimized global production footprint can give a company a strategic edge by delivering long-term savings of around 20 percent of total landed costs.1 Savings can even exceed 40 percent for companies with a legacy of fragmented sites in high-wage countries. The globalization of a company’s production and sourcing also creates a platform for entry into new markets. However, planning and execution are still a feat — on average, the companies we surveyed had only achieved production cost reductions of 13 percent in recent relocations. To get the full benefit of global production, companies must adopt an integrated perspective that extends across the value chain and covers multiple input factors from labor costs and productivity, materials, energy, and logistics through to customs, taxes, and exchange rates. Changes to product design and process technology should also be explored. As these elements can dramatically alter the economics, companies also need a new quantitative approach that does justice to the many factors involved. Management should also take a fresh look at existing locations. Operational improvements, such as lean production methods, can make existing sites more competitive. These opportunities need to be weighed in order to compare sites fairly; they can also point the way to a more gradual transition to a new footprint and lower restructuring costs. A clear transition plan to the target structure needs to factor in the speed and sequence of migration to optimize net present value and return on investment. Companies have to be proactive to maintain their competitiveness. The challenge is to move from an incremental to an integrated approach folding production into a global operations and growth strategy that is able to react dynamically to market changes and is regularly reviewed by top management.
Suggested Citation
Tobias Meyer & Frank Jacob, 2008.
"Network Design: Optimizing the Global Production Footprint,"
Springer Books, in: Eberhard Abele & Tobias Meyer & Ulrich Näher & Gernot Strube & Richard Sykes (ed.), Global Production, chapter 4, pages 140-190,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-71653-2_4
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71653-2_4
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-71653-2_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.