IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-28091-0_30.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Experimental Investigation of a Two Route Scenario with Construction Areas

In: Traffic and Granular Flow ’03

Author

Listed:
  • R. Selten

    (University of Bonn, Laboratory of Experimental Economics)

  • M. Schreckenberg

    (University Duisburg-Essen, Physics of Transport and Traffic)

  • T. Chmura

    (University of Bonn, Laboratory of Experimental Economics)

  • T. Pitz

    (University of Bonn, Laboratory of Experimental Economics)

Abstract

Summary The paper reports laboratory experiments on a day-to-day route choice game with two routes and alternating construction areas on both routes. Subjects had to choose between a main road M and a side road S. The capacity was in every period greater for the main road. 18 subjects participated in each session. In periods without construction areas the equilibrium is 12 players on M and 6 players on S. In periods with construction areas on M the equilibrium is 10 players on M and 8 players on S. In periods with construction areas on S the equilibrium is 15 players on M and 3 players on S. Two treatments with 6 sessions each were run at the Laboratory of Experimental Economics at Bonn University. Feedback was given in treatment I only about own travel time and in treatment II on travel time for M and S. Money payoffs increase with decreasing time. Subjects are told that in each of 200 periods they have to make a choice between the two routes.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Selten & M. Schreckenberg & T. Chmura & T. Pitz, 2005. "Experimental Investigation of a Two Route Scenario with Construction Areas," Springer Books, in: Serge P. Hoogendoorn & Stefan Luding & Piet H. L. Bovy & Michael Schreckenberg & Dietrich E. Wolf (ed.), Traffic and Granular Flow ’03, pages 317-324, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-28091-0_30
    DOI: 10.1007/3-540-28091-X_30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-28091-0_30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.