IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-55762-5_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Demon’s Fallacy: Simulation Modeling and a New Style of Reasoning

In: The Science and Art of Simulation I

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Lenhard

    (University of Bielefeld, Department of Philosophy)

Abstract

Simulation is based on the vast increase in computational power that is available to researchers. This increase, however, does not by itself characterize simulation. What philosophically matters are the conceptual ramifications. Simulation modeling combines extant concepts in a new way. It intertwines different types of experiments and in this way gives rise to a new combinatorial style of reasoning. The argument in favor of this thesis discusses two exemplars of simulation, namely thermodynamics and quantum chemistry. The conclusion reflects upon some of the resulting challenges for the philosophy of science.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Lenhard, 2017. "The Demon’s Fallacy: Simulation Modeling and a New Style of Reasoning," Springer Books, in: Michael M. Resch & Andreas Kaminski & Petra Gehring (ed.), The Science and Art of Simulation I, pages 137-151, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-55762-5_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55762-5_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-55762-5_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.