IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-52636-2_241.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Patient-Reported Outcomes

In: Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Gresham

    (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute)

  • Patricia A. Ganz

    (University of California at Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are defined as any report that comes directly from a patient. Their use as key outcomes in clinical trials has increased significantly, especially during the last decade. PROs encompass a variety of measurements including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptoms, functional status, safety, utilities, and satisfaction ratings. Selection of the PRO in a trial will depend on a variety of factors including the trial’s objectives, study population, disease or condition, as well as the type of treatment or intervention. PROs can be used to inform clinical care and to support drug approval and labeling claims. This chapter will provide an overview of the different types of PROs with examples and their role in healthcare within the context of clinical trials. Summaries of important regulatory documents including the FDA PRO guidance and recommendations (SPIRIT and CONSORT PRO extensions) will also be provided. Considerations when designing clinical trials are described in the last section, highlighting important issues and topics that are unique to PROs. Many methodologic and analytic features of PROs are similar to those of any outcomes used in clinical trials; thus they require the same methodological rigor with special attention to missing data. This chapter is written with a focus on the use of PROs in interventional trials in the United States, although most information can be applied to any context. Information presented in this chapter is relevant to clinicians, researchers, policy makers, regulatory and funding agencies, as well as patients. When used appropriately, PROs can generate high-quality data about the effects of a particular intervention on a patient’s physical, psychological, functional, and symptomatic experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Gresham & Patricia A. Ganz, 2022. "Patient-Reported Outcomes," Springer Books, in: Steven Piantadosi & Curtis L. Meinert (ed.), Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials, chapter 51, pages 915-937, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-52636-2_241
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52636-2_241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-52636-2_241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.