IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-52636-2_183.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Reporting Biases

In: Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • S. Swaroop Vedula

    (The Johns Hopkins University, Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Whiting School of Engineering)

  • Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

    (University of Southern Denmark, Cochrane Denmark and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense)

  • Matthew J. Page

    (Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine)

Abstract

Clinical trials are experiments in human beings. Findings from these experiments, either by themselves or within research syntheses, are often meant to evidence-based clinical decision-making. These decisions can be misled when clinical trials are reported in a biased manner. For clinical trials to inform healthcare decisions without bias, their reporting should be complete, timely, transparent, and accessible. Reporting of clinical trials is biased when it is influenced by the nature and direction of its results. Reporting biases in clinical trials may manifest in different ways, including results not being reported at all, reported in part, with delay, or in sources of scientific literature that are harder to access. Biased reporting of clinical trials in turn can introduce bias into research syntheses, with the eventual consequence being misinformed healthcare decisions. Clinical trial registration, access to protocols and statistical analysis plans, and guidelines for transparent and complete reporting are critical to prevent reporting biases.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Swaroop Vedula & Asbjørn Hróbjartsson & Matthew J. Page, 2022. "Reporting Biases," Springer Books, in: Steven Piantadosi & Curtis L. Meinert (ed.), Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials, chapter 103, pages 2045-2071, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-52636-2_183
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52636-2_183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-52636-2_183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.