IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-23497-7_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Applying Design of Experiments Methodology to PEI Toxicity Assay on Neural Progenitor Cells

In: Mathematical Models in Biology

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Mancinelli

    (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics “A. Buzzati Traverso” (IGB), CNR)

  • Valeria Zazzu

    (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics “A. Buzzati Traverso” (IGB), CNR)

  • Andrea Turcato

    (Valore Qualità)

  • Giuseppina Lacerra

    (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics “A. Buzzati Traverso” (IGB), CNR)

  • Filomena Anna Digilio

    (Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IBBR), CNR)

  • Anna Mascia

    (Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology “G. Salvatore” (IEOS), CNR)

  • Marta Di Carlo

    (Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology “A. Monroy” (IBIM), CNR)

  • Anna Maria Cirafici

    (Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology “G. Salvatore” (IEOS), CNR)

  • Antonella Bongiovanni

    (Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology “A. Monroy” (IBIM), CNR)

  • Gianni Colotti

    (CNR, Sapienza University, Department of Biochemical Sciences, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM))

  • Annamaria Kisslinger

    (Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology “G. Salvatore” (IEOS), CNR)

  • Antonella Lanati

    (Valore Qualità)

  • Giovanna L. Liguori

    (Institute of Genetics and Biophysics “A. Buzzati Traverso” (IGB), CNR)

Abstract

Design of Experiments (DoE) statistical methodology permits the simultaneous evaluation of the effects of different factors on experimental performance and the analysis of their interactions in order to identify their optimal combinations. Compared to classical approaches based on changing only one factor at a time (OFAT), DoE facilitates the exploration of a broader range of parameters combinations, as well as providing the possibility to select a limited number of combinations covering the whole frame. The advantage of DoE is to maximise the amount of information provided and to save both time and money. DoE has been primarily used in industry to maximise process robustness, but recently it has also been applied in biomedical research to different types of multivariable analyses, from determination of the best cell media composition to the optimisation of entire multi-step laboratory protocols such as cell transfection. Our case study is the optimisation of a transfection protocol for neural progenitor cell lines. These cells are very hard to transfect and are refractory to lipidic reagents, so we decided to set-up a protocol based on the non-lipidic Poliethylenimine (PEI) reagent. However, the effect of PEI toxicity on cells has to be correctly evaluated in the experimental design, since it can affect output computation. For this reason, we decided to apply DoE methodology to investigate the effect of PEI, both concentration and type, on cell viability and its interaction with other factors, such as DNA and cell density. The statistics-based DoE approach allowed us to express analytically the neural cell viability dependence on PEI amount/cell and efficiently identify the dose levels of PEI suitable for transfection experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Mancinelli & Valeria Zazzu & Andrea Turcato & Giuseppina Lacerra & Filomena Anna Digilio & Anna Mascia & Marta Di Carlo & Anna Maria Cirafici & Antonella Bongiovanni & Gianni Colotti & Annamaria , 2015. "Applying Design of Experiments Methodology to PEI Toxicity Assay on Neural Progenitor Cells," Springer Books, in: Valeria Zazzu & Maria Brigida Ferraro & Mario R. Guarracino (ed.), Mathematical Models in Biology, edition 1, pages 45-63, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-23497-7_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23497-7_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-23497-7_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.