IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-18539-2_20.html

Reporting and Interpreting of Results

In: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence M. Friedman
  • Curt D. Furberg

    (Wake Forest School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences)

  • David L. DeMets

    (University of Wisconsin, Department Biostatistics and Medical Informatics)

  • David M. Reboussin

    (Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics)

  • Christopher B. Granger

    (Duke University, Department of Medicine)

Abstract

The final phase in any experiment is to interpret and report the results. Finding the answer to a challenging question is the goal of any research endeavor. Proper communication of the results to clinicians also provides the basis for advances in medicine [1]. To communicate appropriately, investigators have to review their results critically and avoid the temptation to overinterpret benefit or underreport harm. They are in the privileged position of knowing the quality and limitations of the data better than anyone else. Therefore, they have the responsibility for presenting the results clearly and concisely, together with any issues that might bear on their interpretation. Investigators should devote adequate care, time and attention to this critical part of the conduct of clinical trials. We believe that a policy of “conservative” interpretation and reporting best serves science, public health, clinical medicine, and the interests of readers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence M. Friedman & Curt D. Furberg & David L. DeMets & David M. Reboussin & Christopher B. Granger, 2015. "Reporting and Interpreting of Results," Springer Books, in: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials, edition 0, chapter 0, pages 479-499, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-18539-2_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18539-2_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-18539-2_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.