Author
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification in ship structural performance remains uneven. While the ship structure community has long developed probabilistic models for the ocean environment and structural responses, complete quantification frameworks remain the exception not the rule. Much of the current uncertainty focus is around design code development, and more piecemeal responses in areas where current design codes are not adequate. This chapter briefly reviews the current state of the art in ship structural performance, including examples of failures in service. Then, the current design code landscape is reviewed. In design codes today, partial safety factors make scattered appearances, but a wide adoption of such measures is still some time off. While more general concepts of risk are gaining traction in the marine industry for risk-based approval, direct structural performance simulation remains the exception rather than the rule. Different uncertainty types and underlying data are then presented and reviewed. Initially, basic design parameters and underlying operational data are discussed, and then strength and loading models are presented. The fragmented nature of uncertainty quantification is clear across all these topics – while many key responses are described in stochastic frameworks, an equal number of modeling, fabrication, and operational parameters are subject to a large amount of epistemic uncertainty today. This limits the number of integrated uncertainty quantification computations that can be completed today. Finally, an overview of published uncertainty frameworks to date is presented. While none of these frameworks are all-encompassing, they demonstrate both the practical application of uncertainty quantification to current problems and a foundation for future probabilistic modeling advances.
Suggested Citation
Matthew Collette, 2017.
"Uncertainty Approaches in Ship Structural Performance,"
Springer Books, in: Roger Ghanem & David Higdon & Houman Owhadi (ed.), Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, chapter 46, pages 1567-1588,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-12385-1_48
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_48
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-12385-1_48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.