IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-10629-8_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Experimental Study on the Interaction Mechanism of Cross-Walking Pedestrians

In: Traffic and Granular Flow '13

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Lv

    (University of Science and Technology of China, State Key Laboratory of Fire Science)

  • Xiaoge Wei

    (University of Science and Technology of China, State Key Laboratory of Fire Science)

  • Weiguo Song

    (University of Science and Technology of China, State Key Laboratory of Fire Science)

Abstract

In the field of pedestrian dynamics, the interaction mechanism among pedestrians is significant for both system modelling and evacuation designing. In this study, a cross-walking experiment is conducted in two crossed passageways to investigate the microscopic interactions between individuals. Trajectories of 51 groups of pedestrians’ movements are extracted by means of image processing. Four main behaviours, i.e. accelerating, decelerating, detour and keep-walking, are identified when pedestrians walk crosswise. The pair velocities before and after the cross point are also calculated and classified to three modes: the first mode is one accelerating with the conflicting partner decelerating, the second mode is accelerating together or decelerating together, and the third mode is one keeping speed with the conflicting partner accelerating or decelerating. It is found that to avoid conflict, 90.2 % of participants take accelerated behaviour or decelerated behaviour and only 5.9 % of participants take detour behaviour, which implies pedestrians prefer to adjust their speeds rather than change their directions when facing potential conflict. Particularly, 64.7 % of groups of pedestrian avoid the conflict through the coordination mode, i.e. one accelerating with the other decelerating, which indicates the major self-organized behaviour of pedestrian. Two kinds of detour behaviour are also observed from the experiment: detouring ahead the conflicting partner and detouring behind the conflicting partner. It is found the detour ahead the conflicting pedestrian would induce an approximate lateral movement of 0.65–0.75 m, larger than that of 0.55 m when detouring behind the conflicting pedestrian. It is hoped that this study would provide some useful experimental data or conclusions for the research field of pedestrian traffic.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Lv & Xiaoge Wei & Weiguo Song, 2015. "Experimental Study on the Interaction Mechanism of Cross-Walking Pedestrians," Springer Books, in: Mohcine Chraibi & Maik Boltes & Andreas Schadschneider & Armin Seyfried (ed.), Traffic and Granular Flow '13, edition 127, pages 219-226, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-10629-8_26
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10629-8_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-10629-8_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.