IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-10103-3_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

From Hauptsatz to Hilfssatz

In: Gentzen's Centenary

Author

Listed:
  • Jan von Plato

    (University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy)

Abstract

Gentzen found his original consistency proof of arithmetic late in 1934. His work in pure logic was a preliminary to the result. Archival sources show that the consistency proof was based on an explicit semantic notion of correctness as reducibility of sequents and a proof that steps of derivation maintain reducibility. A crucial point in the latter was Gentzen’s Hilfssatz that stated, in analogy to his famous Hauptsatz, that composition of sequents maintains reducibility. The Hilfssatz was needed essentially for the case of the rule of complete induction. It was the point at which Gentzen’s proof superseded standard arithmetic methods in favour of an induction on well-founded trees, i.e., what came later to be called bar induction. After criticisms by Bernays and Gödel, the first proof evolved into one based on transfinite induction. Traces of the Hilfssatz that was founded on intuitionistic ideas disappeared, and Gentzen developed instead transfinite induction further into a general ordinal proof theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan von Plato, 2015. "From Hauptsatz to Hilfssatz," Springer Books, in: Reinhard Kahle & Michael Rathjen (ed.), Gentzen's Centenary, edition 1, pages 89-130, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-10103-3_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10103-3_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-10103-3_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.