Author
Listed:
- Alexander an Haack
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Laura Braun
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Ursula Bach
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- René Vossen
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Sabina Jeschke
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
Abstract
The ratification of the Bologna Process in 1999 has led to fundamental changes in the European higher education area. After more than a decade of Bologna reform efforts, the question arises whether and to what degree the declared goals of the Bologna Process (e.g. increasing student mobility and employability) have been achieved in the educational practice, i.e. on the individual university level. This desire points to the question of what these goals exactly are, how they are structured and how to eventually prioritize among them. The search for a comparable systematisation of the reforms objectives unveils only its absence. This paper presents the work of higher engineering education scientists on the development of a comprehensive understanding of the Bologna Process objectives, their interconnections and practical measures in order to make this large scale reform accessible to the controlling of European universities’ decision making. To this aim, the objectives are mapped in the form of a software based system model, according to the theory of System Dynamics. The elements of the model are fully based on the official Bologna declarations, memoranda as well as expert literature. It therefore claims to represent the state of the art on the goals of the Bologna Process. For the first time this system model structures the Bologna goals ordered by levels of hierarchy and it quantifies their dependencies on the basis of the System Dynamics approach. The validity of the model has been assessed based on qualitative and quantitative data, generated in a study involving 29 German experts in the field of higher education specialized on the Bologna Process. Further research will concentrate on a practical application of this system model, including the evaluation of the model’s statements. Ultimately, the model’s insights will enable European universities to estimate their respective degrees of Bologna goal attainment and to identify key measures for individual improvement.
Suggested Citation
Alexander an Haack & Laura Braun & Ursula Bach & René Vossen & Sabina Jeschke, 2014.
"Mapping the Goals of the Bologna Process,"
Springer Books, in: Sabina Jeschke & Ingrid Isenhardt & Frank Hees & Klaus Henning (ed.), Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014, edition 127, pages 279-292,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-08816-7_22
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_22
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-08816-7_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.