Author
Listed:
- Stefan Schröder
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Claudia Jooß
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Anja Richert
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
- Ingrid Isenhardt
(RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)
Abstract
In June 2012 the further funding of the research cluster of excellence (CoE) “Tailor-Made Fuels from Biomass” (TMFB) at RWTH Aachen University (2012–2017) was announced by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Council of Science and Humanities. In this context the Supplementary Cluster Activities (SCA) within the CoE were enlarged to expend the promotion of an effective and efficient cross linking of CoE members by means of knowledge engineering and knowledge transfer, such as the determination and measurement of cluster-specific key performance indicators. Overall, the SCA aspire to ensure the high quality of research by measuring and evaluating the performance of the cluster. Therefore inter alia in the first funding period a cluster-specific Balanced Scorecard was implemented and regularly adapted for the requirements of the cluster. This yearly evaluation rather deals with performance measurement on a meta level, admits a cluster wide overview of research level and gives recommendations of action to the cluster management. The augmenting dynamic and complexity of scientific forms of cooperation require new approaches for interlinking people and knowledge from different disciplines to enable people for succeeding in interdisciplinary cooperation and in general lead the CoE-“TMFB” to success. Preliminary studies, e.g. empirical analyzes as well as recommendations of the German Council of Science and Humanities, offer further valuable clues to relevant indicators of scientific processes such as in CoE-“TMFB”. Here the combination of quantitative and qualitative parameters is discussed to measure performance in a complex cluster. Therefore the further development of performance measurement in the second funding period will establish an advanced performance measurement approach which supplements the contemporary cluster-specific Balanced Scorecard and target interdisciplinary performance comparison on sub-project (micro) level. For this purpose it is necessary to analyze and operationalize the requirements i.e. of the management, industrial partners or the research funding organizations. More importantly thematic key aspects such as output, interdisziplinarity, international presence, impact of the cluster as a system and internal process enhancement have to be considered and integrated. This new approach will operate parallel to the BSC and supplement the contemporary evaluation approach. While measuring the degree of target achievement is supposed to be more relevant in DFG-audits, the quality of internal, interdisciplinary processes is an important indicator of cluster-internal target achievement, too. The improvement of the quality of processes will be supported by the investigation of potential for optimization and efficient cross-linking of the CoE members. This aspires a more efficient use of resources parallel to a continuously high quality of research results. The vision of SCA is to foster interdisciplinary exchange and a continuous comparison of research achievements of the CoE in accordance with the overall vision of the cluster and the DFG performance criteria.
Suggested Citation
Stefan Schröder & Claudia Jooß & Anja Richert & Ingrid Isenhardt, 2014.
"Further Development of a Performance Measurement Approach in a Research Cluster of Excellence,"
Springer Books, in: Sabina Jeschke & Ingrid Isenhardt & Frank Hees & Klaus Henning (ed.), Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014, edition 127, pages 125-135,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-08816-7_11
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_11
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-08816-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.