IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-032-13608-4_9.html

Ineffective Critical Mass

In: Board Gender Diversity and Critical Mass Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Lefley

    (University of Hradec Králové, Faculty of Informatics and Management)

  • Václav Janeček

    (University of Hradec Králové, Faculty of Informatics and Management)

Abstract

Critical mass is all about the numbers, as shown in the extensive and up-to-date articles referenced earlier. Critical mass, therefore, misses the mark, as it does not take into account the fact that women may have other motives/objectives and loyalties which result in them not working as a “collective action” as the theory suggests. Identity structures may also play a part, resulting in individuals being placed into demographic categories based on similarities and differences within and between category boundaries (Randel, 2002). The critical mass theory assumes that women need to work as a collective action, but is this always the case? In this chapter, which extends our earlier work (Lefley & Janeček, 2025), we examine and find theoretical support for the qualitative factors that contribute to the ineffectiveness of a critical mass. It embraces the theoretical concepts of intersectionality, contextual moderators, and power dynamics concerning gender. While these theoretical concepts were initially thought to relate only to gender differences (the differences between men and women), a closer examination reveals that they can equally be applied to explaining the differences between women themselves, especially concerning identity: age, culture, race, ethnicity, social identity, loyalty, etc., and contribute to an ineffective critical mass.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Lefley & Václav Janeček, 2026. "Ineffective Critical Mass," Springer Books, in: Board Gender Diversity and Critical Mass Theory, chapter 9, pages 229-243, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-13608-4_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-13608-4_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-13608-4_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.