IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-032-12670-2_13.html

Artificial Empathy: Evaluating AI Emotional Support Systems in Organizations

In: The Palgrave Handbook of Emotions and Values in Organizational Institutionalism

Author

Listed:
  • Fares Ahmad

    (University of California, Department of Technology Management, College of Engineering)

  • Nelson Phillips

    (University of California, Department of Technology Management, College of Engineering)

Abstract

This paper critically examines the emergence of AI-mediated emotional support in organizational settings using Carl Rogers’ person-centered therapy framework. The authors analyze how these AI systems emulate aspects of Rogerian therapeutic relationships and in doing so challenge fundamental assumptions about authentic connection. Drawing on recent empirical evidence, the authors argue that AI can effectively provide unconditional positive regard and simulated empathy, often receiving high ratings from users who feel safe and understood. However, AI fundamentally lacks congruence due to its inability to experience genuine emotions. The paper explores challenges raised by these systems including privacy concerns, surveillance risks, and implementation barriers within institutional contexts. Rather than viewing AI as a replacement for human emotional support, the authors propose that its most profound impact may be in prompting deeper institutional reflection on emotional connection in organizational life. The research contributes to understanding how technological innovations intersect with human emotional needs, potentially reshaping both individual experiences and organizational approaches to well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Fares Ahmad & Nelson Phillips, 2026. "Artificial Empathy: Evaluating AI Emotional Support Systems in Organizations," Springer Books, in: Gry Espedal & Trish Ruebottom & Marta Struminska-Kutra & Jose Bento da Silva & Douglas Creed (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Emotions and Values in Organizational Institutionalism, chapter 13, pages 339-373, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-12670-2_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-12670-2_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-12670-2_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.