IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-032-10326-0_11.html

Analysis of Romania’s Economic Efficiency Compared to EU Member States Using the DEA Method

In: Sustainable Economic Development and the European Green Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Costinela Fortea

    (University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, Business Administration)

Abstract

In the context of the EU’s strategic objectives for sustainable growth, competitiveness, and social cohesion, the evaluation of economic efficiency across Member States has gained increasing relevance. The heterogeneity of resource endowments, institutional capacities and development trajectories within the EU generates significant differences in how countries transform inputs—such as labour, technology and infrastructure—into economic and social outcomes. Against this backdrop, comparative analyses that employ robust quantitative techniques are essential for identifying efficiency gaps, highlighting best practices, and informing policy design aimed at convergence and resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Costinela Fortea, 2026. "Analysis of Romania’s Economic Efficiency Compared to EU Member States Using the DEA Method," Springer Books, in: Sustainable Economic Development and the European Green Deal, chapter 0, pages 401-438, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-10326-0_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-10326-0_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-10326-0_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.