IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-90907-8_13.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Profitability of Suboptimal Trend-Following Rules

In: The Ultimate Moving Average Handbook

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriy Zakamulin

    (University of Agder, Norway)

  • Javier Giner

    (University of La Laguna)

Abstract

Traders typically rely on backtesting to identify the best trading rule, believing it to be a reliable and thorough method. However, this chapter challenges that assumption by evaluating the precision of backtesting and finding it to be highly inaccurate. The analysis demonstrates that even with extensive historical data, the probability of correctly identifying the optimal trend-following rule remains low, leading traders to use suboptimal strategies. The chapter then quantifies the loss in profitability from employing non-optimal rules and examines whether these rules still provide an advantage over passive investment strategies. Surprisingly, the results show that while suboptimal rules do not maximize the performance of the trend-following strategy, they often perform comparably to optimal rules due to the high correlation in trading signals across different trend-following strategies. Moreover, even imperfect trend-following rules frequently outperform passive investing, highlighting the robustness of trend-following as a strategy. These findings suggest that while the search for the perfect trading rule may be futile, traders can still achieve strong results with a well-structured, albeit non-optimal, trend-following approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriy Zakamulin & Javier Giner, 2025. "Profitability of Suboptimal Trend-Following Rules," Springer Books, in: The Ultimate Moving Average Handbook, chapter 0, pages 473-502, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-90907-8_13
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-90907-8_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-90907-8_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.