IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-83157-7_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Selecting Representative Samples from Malware Datasets

In: Machine Learning, Deep Learning and AI for Cybersecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Lukáš Děd

    (Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Information Technology)

  • Martin Jureček

    (Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Information Technology)

Abstract

This work focuses on the selection of representative instances for the training set in malware detection. Opposed to random instance selection, the goal of instance selection algorithms is to remove noise and redundancy while preserving relevant data for solving the task. Experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets containing metadata of Windows PE files, namely the EMBER and SOREL-20M datasets. The theoretical part describes data preprocessing methods, instance selection algorithms, and classification algorithms used in the practical part of this work. The practical part outlines the process of preprocessing datasets and main experiments related to the comparison of state-of-the-art instance selection algorithms. As part of the work, modifications to the parallel instance selection algorithm PIF were proposed and implemented, and these were also experimentally evaluated and compared with the results of state-of-the-art instance selection algorithms. Some of the modified versions ranked among the best in terms of reduction level as well as the ratio between accuracy and the size of the reduced sets. The best among the modified versions was the RPIF-AllKNN algorithm, which reduced the entire training set of the SOREL-20M dataset to 6.24% of its original size with an accuracy loss of 2.1%. The ratio between accuracy and the size of the reduced set was 14.43 and in terms of this metric, RPIF-AllKNN was the best among the compared algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukáš Děd & Martin Jureček, 2025. "Selecting Representative Samples from Malware Datasets," Springer Books, in: Mark Stamp & Martin Jureček (ed.), Machine Learning, Deep Learning and AI for Cybersecurity, pages 113-142, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-83157-7_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-83157-7_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-83157-7_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.