IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-83157-7_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing Balancing Techniques for Malware Classification

In: Machine Learning, Deep Learning and AI for Cybersecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Ranjit John

    (San Jose State University)

  • Fabio Di Troia

    (San Jose State University)

Abstract

Imbalanced datasets often disproportionately represent certain types of malware, which can negatively impact the performance of machine learning classifiers. This imbalance can result in insufficient data for rarer but highly dangerous malware, leading to potential detection failures with serious consequences. To address this, data balancing techniques have proven effective in improving the representation of minority classes and mitigating bias toward the majority class. Recent studies have also shown that generative models can successfully create synthetic data that closely mirrors real datasets. In this paper, we explore various balancing techniques and generate synthetic opcode sequence data to enhance the training of machine learning models for improved malware classification. Our approach includes oversampling, undersampling, hybrid sampling, and the use of Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) to generate synthetic samples. We assess the effectiveness of these methods in tackling the class imbalance problem in multi-class malware classification.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranjit John & Fabio Di Troia, 2025. "Comparing Balancing Techniques for Malware Classification," Springer Books, in: Mark Stamp & Martin Jureček (ed.), Machine Learning, Deep Learning and AI for Cybersecurity, pages 61-92, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-83157-7_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-83157-7_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-83157-7_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.