Author
Listed:
- Diane Losardo
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Sy-Miin Chow
(The Pennsylvania State University)
- A. T. Panter
(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
- Melissa Burkley
(Oklahoma State University)
- Edward Burkley
(Oklahoma State University)
Abstract
Developing feasible study designs that minimize the number of participant responses while retaining acceptable statistical properties has been a challenge in psychological research, thus motivating the developments and use of planned missing designs in longitudinal panel studies. In this study we propose several planned missingness designs for experience sampling/ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies and evaluate the statistical implications and trade-offs involved in reducing the number of data points collected per person. We consider change trajectories arising from the latent growth curve, multilevel, and time series contexts. A Monte Carlo simulation study revealed that factors such as the type of change trajectory and the placement of data points can greatly affect the estimation results even when the number of time points is held constant. Traditional growth curve models and an autoregressive time series model of order 1 worked well with most planned missingness designs, while a moving average time series model of order 1 required a more careful selection of the planned missingness scheme. Findings also revealed that most planned missingness designs were robust to identifying correctly specified models provided that the correct time intervals are used, thus providing enriched options for researchers and practitioners to collect fewer data points with negligible costs to statistical power.
Suggested Citation
Diane Losardo & Sy-Miin Chow & A. T. Panter & Melissa Burkley & Edward Burkley, 2024.
"Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Designs with Planned Missingness,"
Springer Books, in: Mark Stemmler & Wolfgang Wiedermann & Francis L. Huang (ed.), Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 657-698,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-56318-8_26
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-56318-8_26
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-56318-8_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.