IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-48169-7_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Portfolio Performance Measures

In: Professional Investment Portfolio Management

Author

Listed:
  • James W. Kolari

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Wei Liu

    (Texas A&M University)

  • Seppo Pynnönen

    (University of Vaasa)

Abstract

The true market portfolio of the CAPM on the efficient frontier (located at the tangent point of the line extending from the riskless rate) is not observable in the real world. Sharpe received the Nobel Prize in Economics for developing the CAPM and proposed that portfolio performance can be compared by computing their excess returns divided by the standard deviation of returns (or total risk). This so-called Sharpe ratio is one of the most widely used measures of portfolio efficiency. However, it does not take into account beta risk in the CAPM. In this regard, Gibbons et al. (Econometrica 57:1121–1152, 1989) (GRS) proposed a test of whether any particular portfolio is ex ante mean-variance efficient in the context of the market model version of the CAPM. More specifically, they modified the Hotelling $$T^2$$ T 2 test to take into account whether a portfolio lies on the efficient frontierEfficient frontier. While the Sharpe ratio and GRS test are prominent in academic studies on portfolio performance, practitioners have developed other metrics to evaluate portfolio performance. One such popular measure is drawdowns, which is tantamount to value at risk (VaR). If a portfolio exhibits high periodic drawdowns, it is necessary to carefully evaluate the potential gains in the long run that may serve to counterbalance this risk.

Suggested Citation

  • James W. Kolari & Wei Liu & Seppo Pynnönen, 2023. "Portfolio Performance Measures," Springer Books, in: Professional Investment Portfolio Management, chapter 0, pages 97-119, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-48169-7_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48169-7_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-48169-7_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.