IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-25998-2_68.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Animal Ethics and Welfare as Practised by Small Ruminant Farmers in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State Nigeria

In: Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • F. O. Bamigboye

    (Afe Babalola University)

  • A. J. Amuda

    (Federal University Wukari)

  • J. O. Oluwasusi

    (Afe Babalola University)

  • E. O. Ademola

    (Ademola Ojo Emmanuel Foundation)

Abstract

Purpose: In Nigeria, animal ethics and welfare is not common issue among Small Ruminant (SR) farmers despite their importance in improving productivity. Hence, the level of compliance with ethical production techniques by SR producers in Ado-Ekiti was evaluated. Design/Methodology/Approach: Structured questionnaire was employed to elicit information on socioeconomic characteristics and SR management from the respondents. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 87 respondents. Also, supplements were collected from the respondents and analyzed for their chemical composition using standard procedures (AOAC). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA. Findings: Small ruminant producers in the area adhered to some ethical practices in their daily production activities; most fed their animals with supplements twice daily, treated sick animals and transported their animals for sale in the morning. All the respondents offered water to their animals but not ad-libitum and from any source. Some of the respondents did not provide housing facilities for their animals. The proximate composition of supplement; crude protein values ranged from 2.94 to 11.91% in cassava peel and beans chaff respectively, crude fibre: 4.06 to 24.94% and ether extract: 0.64 to 9.22% in cassava sievate and bean chaff respectively, ash content: 3.00 to 11.36% in cassava peel and banana peel, respectively. The mineral composition for sodium ranged from 37.200 to 591.267 ppm, calcium: 24.867 to 5060.33 ppm, phosphorus: 28.036 to 125.670 ppm and magnesium: 7.115 to 57.024 ppm. Iron ranged from 5.241 to 36.106 ppm, copper from 0.103 to 1.827 ppm and zinc from 0.019 to 21.186 ppm. Implications/Research Limitations: Most supplements can complement each other incredibly when mixed. However, mixing ratio and correlation scaling can be areas for further study. Practical Implications: The findings of the present study would be useful for small ruminant farmers in terms of requirements for animal ethics and welfare. Also, researchers/animal nutritionists will have access to the proximate and mineral compositions of the common supplements evaluated as the baseline. Originality/Value: Consideration of welfare and ethics among small ruminant farmers in Nigeria is not well researched. Hence, the present study enlightened farmers on the ethical management practices in small ruminant farming.

Suggested Citation

  • F. O. Bamigboye & A. J. Amuda & J. O. Oluwasusi & E. O. Ademola, 2023. "Animal Ethics and Welfare as Practised by Small Ruminant Farmers in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State Nigeria," Springer Books, in: Clinton Aigbavboa & Joseph N. Mojekwu & Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Lawrence Atepor & Emmanuel Adi (ed.), Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, pages 888-901, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_68
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.