IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-25998-2_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessment of Refuse Shute Practices in Medium-Rise Buildings Within the Greater Accra Region, Ghana

In: Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • M. Pim-Wusu

    (Accra Technical University)

  • T. Adu Gyamfi

    (Koforidua Technical University)

  • B. M. Arthur-Aidoo

    (Accra Technical University)

  • P. R. Nunoo

    (Accra Technical University)

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores how waste can be effectively managed and controlled in medium-rise buildings in Ghana. This was to ease the struggle, pain, and inconveniences and safely accumulate in one discreet location that people do not inhabit. Hence the study aims to assess refuse chute practices in medium-rise buildings within the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Design/Methodology/Approach: A quantitative approach methodology technique was adopted for the study covering Accra Central, where people mostly live in medium-rise buildings. Primary data were collected using a questionnaire survey. The study employed a random sampling technique. A sample size of 150 was used, while data obtained from the study were analysed and presented in a frequency distribution, percentages, and inferential statistics with SPSS. Findings: The study found that respondents have limited access to refuse chutes in their medium-rise buildings. The study reveals the benefits of using garbage chutes as convenient disposal, a hygienic environment, waste segregation for recycling, prevention of gem development, and no physical contact with refuse. The study further discovered that strategies to overcome the challenges of not using refuse chutes include checking chute design in permit approval, monitoring chute construction, and developing policies on chute construction. Implications/Research Limitations: The revelation of this research means it is essential for an agency or authority mandated to regulate building construction activities to enforce the law regarding incorporating refuse chutes in medium-rise buildings. The present study was limited to the Greater Accra Region; however, the study could have been broadened further to cover the entire country due to the population increase where people live in medium-rise buildings. Practical Implications: The Study’s discovery is significant to building approval institutions that medium-rise building plans must incorporate refuse chutes before approval is issued. Originality/Value: literature in Ghana indicates little or no studies on refuse chute practice in medium-rise buildings in Ghana. The outcomes of the research have proven that a refuse chute is not popular in the country, so it is imperative to incorporate one to ease the struggle, pain, and inconveniences for the occupants of the medium-rise building. Founded on previous empirical and theoretical studies, the results of this research contribute to knowledge and understanding of the refuse chute practises in medium-rise buildings in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Pim-Wusu & T. Adu Gyamfi & B. M. Arthur-Aidoo & P. R. Nunoo, 2023. "Assessment of Refuse Shute Practices in Medium-Rise Buildings Within the Greater Accra Region, Ghana," Springer Books, in: Clinton Aigbavboa & Joseph N. Mojekwu & Wellington Didibhuku Thwala & Lawrence Atepor & Emmanuel Adi (ed.), Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, pages 52-62, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-25998-2_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.