IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-031-17707-1_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Do Urban Dwellers View Bribery Differently Than Rural Dwellers? An Empirical Study of Views in 76 Countries

In: The Ethics of Bribery

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. McGee

    (Fayetteville State University)

  • Maria Mercedes A. Jáuregui Guadron

    (USDA Farm Service Agency)

Abstract

The present study is part of a much larger study that examined the ethics of bribery and the ethics of tax evasion from a variety of perspectives. In this study, data were taken from the most recent World Values Survey. Seventy-six countries were included in the survey. Of the 76 countries included in the survey, 49 (64.4%) of the urban and rural populations did not differ significantly in their view of bribe taking. Rural populations considered taking a bribe to be significantly more serious in 15 countries (19.7%). Urban populations considered taking a bribe to be significantly more serious in 12 countries (15.8%).

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. McGee & Maria Mercedes A. Jáuregui Guadron, 2023. "Do Urban Dwellers View Bribery Differently Than Rural Dwellers? An Empirical Study of Views in 76 Countries," Springer Books, in: Robert W. McGee & Serkan Benk (ed.), The Ethics of Bribery, chapter 0, pages 241-254, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-17707-1_14
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17707-1_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-17707-1_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.