IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-90716-7_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Subsurface Evaluation Through Multi-scenario Reasoning

In: Interactive Data Processing and 3D Visualization of the Solid Earth

Author

Listed:
  • Ingrid Chieh Yu

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Irina Pene

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Crystal Chang Din

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Leif Harald Karlsen

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Chi Mai Nguyen

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Oliver Stahl

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

  • Adnan Latif

    (University of Oslo, Department of Informatics, SIRIUS SFI)

Abstract

Interpretation of the subsurface in order to find out where hydrocarbons are located is a challenging task for explorationists. They need to be creative and come up with innovative ideas when defining and assessing new prospects, especially nowadays when the easy to find, big fields have been already discovered. The challenges related to prospect assessment are (1) the geodata is uncertain, intermittent, sparse, multiresolution, and multi-scale, and (2) the explorationists often limit themselves to assess few possible scenarios. In this chapter, we try to address these challenges by looking into logic-based techniques for subsurface modeling. We demonstrate how the inherent complexity in geology, such as spatial and temporal aspects, can be formally captured and reasoned about using the strength of different formalizations. We consolidate the various modeling techniques into a methodology for creating multiple geological scenarios and conceptual reasoning about their merits by answering how? and why? early phase qualitative prospect assessment questions. This logic-based technology enables explorationists to express interpretive uncertainty as discrete scenarios with branches of potential alternative interpretations. We use two use cases related to subsurface evaluation to show the applicability of our methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingrid Chieh Yu & Irina Pene & Crystal Chang Din & Leif Harald Karlsen & Chi Mai Nguyen & Oliver Stahl & Adnan Latif, 2021. "Subsurface Evaluation Through Multi-scenario Reasoning," Springer Books, in: Daniel Patel (ed.), Interactive Data Processing and 3D Visualization of the Solid Earth, pages 325-355, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-90716-7_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90716-7_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-90716-7_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.