IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-76096-0_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Marginal Productivity Theory

In: Putting Jurisprudence Back Into Economics

Author

Listed:
  • David Ellerman

    (University of Ljubljana)

Abstract

Neoclassical economic theory pays indirect homage to the imputation principle of jurisprudence by giving a metaphorical interpretation of the factor payments according to marginal productivity (MP) in competitive equilibrium so that “each factor gets what it produces.” This chapter does not make the usual criticism for MP theory being unrealistic, hard to measure, involving idealized informational assumptions, and the like. Again, the real problems lie largely at the level of jurisprudence. Instead of the employer, employees, and input suppliers being in some sort of metaphorical partnership, each getting a share of the product, the actual property rights are that the employer legally appropriates 100% of the assets and liabilities created in production (so the employees qua employees get 0% of that production vector like the other mere suppliers of inputs). The metaphorical MP theory also treats all causally efficacious (or ‘productive’) factors as if they were responsible agents like persons, but the actual juridical principle only imputes legal responsibility to persons as was repeatedly pointed out by the legally-trained Austrian Friedrich von Wieser in the late nineteenth century. And the usual scalar notion of marginal productivity suggests an immaculate or ‘virgin-birth’ notion of production where each unit of a factor produces its marginal product without the use of other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ellerman, 2021. "Marginal Productivity Theory," Springer Books, in: Putting Jurisprudence Back Into Economics, chapter 0, pages 89-118, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-76096-0_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-76096-0_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-76096-0_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.