IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-75532-4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Does Control Change Nature in Industrial Digital Work? A Secondary Analysis of the 1991–2015 European Working Conditions Surveys

In: The Collective Dimensions of Employment Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Albano

    (University of Turin)

  • Ylenia Curzi

    (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)

  • Tania Parisi

    (University of Turin)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to identify the prevalent trend in control and surveillance in industry since 1990 to present, focusing in particular on the differences between highly digitalized and traditional workers. The authors elaborate three ideal-types of management control, namely Controlled Autonomy, New Tayloristic Control, and Panopticon Control. Then, they analyze data from the 1991–2015 European Working Conditions Surveys. The findings show a growing trend toward forms of control approaching the ideal-type of Controlled Autonomy, particularly among digital workers. Highly digitalized industrial work practices offer greater opportunities for workers to develop new skills and exercise their autonomy. Such an autonomy, however, has an individual rather than a collective character, does not concern strategic organizational objectives and goes along with work intensification. At least in the countries, sector and period considered in the analysis, it seems that digital workers are not able to get out of a growing loneliness, to raise the level of social conflict and to oppose real autonomy to management. The study contributes to the stream of critical research on new post-fordist work practices, which today gains new momentum thanks to the digital transformation of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Albano & Ylenia Curzi & Tania Parisi, 2021. "Does Control Change Nature in Industrial Digital Work? A Secondary Analysis of the 1991–2015 European Working Conditions Surveys," Springer Books, in: Tindara Addabbo & Edoardo Ales & Ylenia Curzi & Tommaso Fabbri & Olga Rymkevich & Iacopo Senatori (ed.), The Collective Dimensions of Employment Relations, chapter 0, pages 81-116, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-75532-4_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75532-4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-75532-4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.