IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-68560-7_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Organizational Dignity in the Perspective of Brazilian, Portuguese and Mozambican Employees

In: Organizational Dignity and Evidence-Based Management

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Luisa Mendes Teixeira
  • Silvia Marcia Russi Domenico
  • Lucia Maria Barbosa Oliveira

Abstract

The aim of this chapter was to compare organizational dignity evaluated by employees of three countries: Brazil, Portugal, and Mozambique. These countries have some cultural aspects in common as Brazil and Mozambique were colonized by Portugal. Could the organizational dignity perceived by employees be the same? In order to achieve the objective of evaluating practices of organizational dignity perceived by Brazilian, Portuguese and Mozambican employees and answer the question, an organizational dignity taxonomy is proposed. The characteristics of a dignified organization were identified, and the EPRA-DO scale to measure organizational dignity practices was refined. The results showed that Brazilians, Portuguese, and Mozambican employees evaluate organizational dignity of the companies they worked for differently. The factor of organizational dignity Practices of Promotion of Employees impact Brazilian employees’ satisfaction almost twice as much as Portuguese and Mozambican. These results are important and call attention for management. In spite of the fact that the companies are in countries that have the same cultural root does not mean the employees evaluate the organizational dignity in the same way. These findings are especially important as organizational dignity influences the employee’s satisfaction with company.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Luisa Mendes Teixeira & Silvia Marcia Russi Domenico & Lucia Maria Barbosa Oliveira, 2021. "Organizational Dignity in the Perspective of Brazilian, Portuguese and Mozambican Employees," Springer Books, in: Maria Luisa Mendes Teixeira & Lucia Maria Barbosa de Oliveira (ed.), Organizational Dignity and Evidence-Based Management, chapter 0, pages 89-104, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-68560-7_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68560-7_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-68560-7_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.