IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-64727-8_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Is Endogenous Total Loanable Funds a Better Modifier Than Total Loanable Funds?

In: Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2

Author

Listed:
  • John J. Heim

    (State University of New York)

Abstract

This chapter examines whether only endogenous growth in loanable funds is a better measure of the extent to which crowd out can be offset than total loanable funds, which includes the Federal Reserve part. For investment, only the endogenous part seemed significant from 1960–2007. Only after the start of quantitative easing in 2008 did FR securities purchases also seem to make a difference. Growth in the endogenous part seemed to have little effect on consumption, suggesting banks channel most loanable funds growth into business, not consumer, lending.

Suggested Citation

  • John J. Heim, 2021. "Is Endogenous Total Loanable Funds a Better Modifier Than Total Loanable Funds?," Springer Books, in: Why Fiscal Stimulus Programs Fail, Volume 2, chapter 0, pages 453-477, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-64727-8_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-64727-8_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-64727-8_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.