IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-34675-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Correlation Between the True and False Discoveries in a Positively Dependent Multiple Comparison Problem

In: Statistical Modeling for Biological Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Qiu

    (University of Rochester, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology)

  • Rui Hu

    (University of Rochester, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology)

Abstract

Testing multiple hypotheses when observations are positively correlated is very common in practice. The dependence between observations can induce dependence between test statistics and distort the joint distribution of the true and false positives. It has a profound impact on the performance of common multiple testing procedures. While the marginal statistical properties of the true and false discoveries such as their means and variances have been extensively studied in the past, their correlation remains unknown. By conducting a thorough simulation study, we find that the true and false positives are likely to be negatively correlated if testing power is high and the opposite holds true—they are likely to be positively correlated if testing power is low. The fact that positive dependence between observations can induce negative correlation between the true and false discoveries may assist researchers in designing multiple testing procedures for dependent tests in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Qiu & Rui Hu, 2020. "Correlation Between the True and False Discoveries in a Positively Dependent Multiple Comparison Problem," Springer Books, in: Anthony Almudevar & David Oakes & Jack Hall (ed.), Statistical Modeling for Biological Systems, pages 63-79, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-34675-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34675-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-34675-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.