IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-19258-7_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

(Article II.3.) Tertium Non Datur, or, on Reasoning Styles in Early Mathematics

In: Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Høyrup

    (Roskilde University, Section for Philosophy and Science Studies)

Abstract

In much general historiography of mathematics, also of the fairly serious kind, Greek mathematics is presented not only as the beginning of systematic deduction and axiomatic presentation but also as the point where mathematics changed from a purely empirical activity to a practice based on reasoning and proof. In a number of recent writings defending the honour of “non-Western” mathematics, seen more or less as an undifferentiated lump, it is on the contrary claimed that there was nothing particular in the ancient Greek proofs, even though (it is paradoxically claimed) for instance the Indians had a different understanding of what constitutes a proof. Basing itself in the main on the relation between Babylonian and Euclidean mathematics, the following tries to clarify the issue, making use of the notions of “naive” versus “critical” reasoning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Høyrup, 2019. "(Article II.3.) Tertium Non Datur, or, on Reasoning Styles in Early Mathematics," Springer Books, in: Selected Essays on Pre- and Early Modern Mathematical Practice, chapter 0, pages 537-563, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-19258-7_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19258-7_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-19258-7_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.