IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-11440-4_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Experimental Investigation of Pedestrian Queuing Behaviour

In: Traffic and Granular Flow '17

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahua Zhang

    (The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Engineering)

  • Miho Iryo-Asano

    (Nagoya University, Department of Environmental Engineering and Architecture)

  • Charitha Dias

    (The University of Tokyo, Institute of Industrial Science)

Abstract

One key aspect of pedestrian dynamics is the pedestrian queuing behaviour particularly in front of bottlenecks. As previous studies have highlighted, features of pedestrian queues in front of different types of bottlenecks are considerably dissimilar. Insights into similarities and differences of pedestrian queuing behaviour for typical bottlenecks can be important for the planning and design of public walking space. However, no sufficient empirical studies have been carried out so far to examine the diversity of pedestrian queuing behaviour. In this study, a series of experiments were performed to explore the characteristics of pedestrian queue formations under different conditions. As the results suggest, pedestrians tend to form organized queues before bottlenecks with a clear pass control (e.g., service counters where only one person can be served once). Wider bottlenecks, capacity reductions and low service rates were found to motivate pedestrians to merge or overtake in the upstream of the bottleneck.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahua Zhang & Miho Iryo-Asano & Charitha Dias, 2019. "Experimental Investigation of Pedestrian Queuing Behaviour," Springer Books, in: Samer H. Hamdar (ed.), Traffic and Granular Flow '17, pages 177-185, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-11440-4_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11440-4_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-11440-4_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.