IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4757-3023-4_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Cogitative Algorithm for Solving the Equal Circles Packing Problem

In: Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Wenqi Huang

    (Huazhong Univ. of Sci. and Tech, Department of Computer Science)

  • Yu-Liang Wu

    (Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong, Department of Computer Science and Engineering)

  • C. K. Wong

    (Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong, Department of Computer Science and Engineering)

Abstract

In the past decades, quite a large number of NP-hard problems have been formulated. These problems can be found in a large number of fields including military, political, engineering, and even business administration. The classical equal circles packing problem is one of them. Unfortunately, though much research has been done in the last two decades on these problems, the results have shown that it is not likely to have any algorithm that is fast and can solve these problems exactly [1]. Consequently, devising approximation heuristics has been an important topic in solving these problems. In [2], an enumeration-based approximation methodology, called the shifting strategy, was proposed. The strategy is of great theoretical significance since it can be regarded as the best approximation algorithm possible for this kind of problems, but it is far from being practical due to its very high polynomial complexity. Therefore, it was suggested toward the end of their paper that other kinds of heuristics with lower time complexity should be sought for practical usage.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenqi Huang & Yu-Liang Wu & C. K. Wong, 1999. "A Cogitative Algorithm for Solving the Equal Circles Packing Problem," Springer Books, in: Ding-Zhu Du & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, pages 591-605, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4757-3023-4_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3023-4_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4757-3023-4_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.