IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4684-9206-4_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Postscript

In: Girolamo Cardano

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Fierz

Abstract

WHEN GALILEO set out to found a new science, he firmly denounced all forms of occultism. Physics was to become a mathematical science. Consequently, Galileo accepted only dimension and motion as primary qualities of a body; these he considered mathematical qualities. God is seen as the great geometer who has given measure to all things. Galileo did not presume to say that all aspects of the order of the universe could be explained and understood on this basis. The abundance and diversity of phenomena seemed to him beyond the capacity of human mathematical thought. But since there are mathematical laws underlying all phenomena, it seemed reasonable to select individual and isolated phenomena and to represent them mathematically, much the same way Archimedes did. Galileo believed that this would at least provide complete and definitive answers to specific questions. The basis of Galilean physics was the idea of “natural” motion. It is an Aristotelean concept, but Galileo gave it an important new meaning. His cosmology is founded on the Copernican world system which designates the circular orbits of the planets around the sun as “natural” motion requiring no further cause. Now the earth is also a celestial body. Therefore, if the earth was a perfect sphere with a perfectly smooth surface, then a body on it, once set in motion, would move with a constant velocity around it. This movement is circular and “natural” and corresponds to the “law of inertia” as Galileo understood it. He believed that by applying this law he had found a theory of tides of which he was very proud.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Fierz, 1983. "Postscript," Springer Books, in: Girolamo Cardano, pages 167-176, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4684-9206-4_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-9206-4_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4684-9206-4_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.