IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4613-8692-6_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Mathematical Responses to Desargues’ Rough Draft on Conics

In: The Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues

Author

Listed:
  • J. V. Field

    (Science Museum)

  • J. J. Gray

    (The Open University)

Abstract

As we have already mentioned, the earliest responses to Desargues’ work on perspective (1636) included accusations of plagiarism. The response to his Rough Draft on Conics was more cautious, and eventually comparatively enthusiastic. The earliest recorded reactions include that of J. Beaugrand (?-1640) who pointed out, correctly, that various construction problems in geometry could be solved on strictly Apollonian lines and not, as Desargues had seemed to imply, only by his new methods. One is reminded of the fact that at the beginning of his Geometrie (1637) Descartes had been at pains to show that his new method could be used to solve problems which had defeated the Ancients. Not all the responses were so negative. In the Rough Draft on Conics Desargues himself mentions two mathematicians who apparently took a sympathetic attitude to his work: Jean Pujos and Jean-Baptiste Chauveau.

Suggested Citation

  • J. V. Field & J. J. Gray, 1987. "Mathematical Responses to Desargues’ Rough Draft on Conics," Springer Books, in: The Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues, chapter 0, pages 31-46, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4613-8692-6_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8692-6_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4613-8692-6_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.