IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4612-4976-4_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Discussion 2: Self-Selection and Performance-Based Ratings: A Case Study in Program Evaluation

In: Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples

Author

Listed:
  • John Hartigan
  • John W. Tukey

Abstract

I’d like to congratulate Burt on the really brilliant display of graphics and data. I’m rather pleased to see none of those fancy Bell Labs type that always make the rest of us feel envious. Moreover, I can’t think of a graphics package that could do routinely anything like what Burt has done. Burt has presented an enormous amount of data about a complex problem and really covered all kinds of questions. The unusual combination of text and symbols and figures is especially important. Most graphics packages can draw lines and symbols and things, but they generally fall down on the kind of combination shown here. Yet that’s just what you want to see. I do really admire the graphics and display—I think it was excellent.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hartigan & John W. Tukey, 1986. "Discussion 2: Self-Selection and Performance-Based Ratings: A Case Study in Program Evaluation," Springer Books, in: Howard Wainer (ed.), Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples, pages 51-55, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4612-4976-4_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4976-4_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4612-4976-4_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.